Public access review
Check relevant robots settings and technical restrictions. Keep search access decisions distinct from unrelated uses of website content.
AI Search
Review how your public website can be discovered and understood in ChatGPT search, with accurate source pages and clear business information.
This work focuses on the pages a search experience can retrieve and reference. We inspect public access, the clarity of important answers and the consistency of business facts. A technical change or rewritten paragraph cannot guarantee a citation in an individual conversation.
Review the relevant crawler settings.
Identify the authoritative business pages.
Explain a specific question clearly.
Review observable visits and citations.
Check relevant robots settings and technical restrictions. Keep search access decisions distinct from unrelated uses of website content.
Clarify the offer, product facts and supporting information on the website. Make important answers understandable in their own context.
Record the questions, date and experience being reviewed. Distinguish a mention, a source citation and an actual referral visit.
Results can vary with the question, context and time. A small sample should not be presented as universal market share.
Maintain names, services and official contact information on pages the business controls. Do not invent third-party recognition.
Inspect access and the important public information.
Clarify source pages and their supporting links.
Record selected search experiences and referrals.
No. The service improves the public source material and reviews observable behaviour; it cannot control a model’s recommendation.
No. This scope concerns public website discovery and information quality, not training or controlling a third-party model.
Review OpenAI’s information for publishers and developers.
ExploreTell us about your website, audience and the work you need.